It-tim ta 'żvilupp NOVESTOM se jirrilaxxa verżjoni ġdida tal- kamera NVS7-D Body Worn Dan ix-xahar. L-NVS7-D il-ġdid se jappoġġja l-karatteristika H.265. HEVC (H.265) hija estensjoni tal-kunċett f'H.264 / MPEG-4. H.265 jipprovdi essenzjalment l-istess livell ta 'kwalità ta' immaġni bħal H.264, iżda l-kodiċi huwa aktar effiċjenti, għalhekk id-daqs tal-vidjo se jkun iżgħar. Fi kliem ieħor, il-verżjoni ta '32GB ta' NVS7 u NVS7-D body Worn Camera tista 'tiffranka aktar fajls tal-vidjo.
B'differenza mill-makroblokki H.264, H.265 jimmaniġġja l-informazzjoni f'unitajiet tas-siġar tal-kodifikazzjoni (CTUs). Is-CTU jista 'jimmaniġġja sa 64 x 64 blokki, filwaqt li l-makroblokki jistgħu jkopru 16 x 16 daqsijiet ta' blokki. Il-kapaċità ta 'HEVC li tikkompressa l-informazzjoni b'mod aktar effiċjenti.
H.264 vs H.265 Kamera tal-Body Worn Id File Size
The size of a video is defined as duration and bit rate. On the basis of the experiment on H.265 vs H.264 file size, we find that bit reduction is inversely proportional to video image quality and also positive to file size. As H.265 encodes the same information with lower bitrates but the same video quality when compared with H264, it’s advisable to convert the video from H.264 to H.265 for saving more space.
From this H.264 vs H.265 comparison above, now we know well that how H.265 is superior to H.264. Without doubt, H.265 will become a widely used codec in the near future as it’s really one of the best ways to compress a video with original quality being remained.
Ħin tal-post: 14-Settembru 2019
